Civ 5 Fall Of Rome Scenario
One of the historical scenarios that I have always enjoyed playing through has been the Fall of the Roman Empire. It is a relatively popular topic game-wise, and has made appearances in the Civilization series, the Total War series, and the Age of Empires series (and probably still others that I have not encountered). As one of the major transition points in Western Civilization, the Fall of the Roman Empire has quite a lot of material to work with. It is thus always interesting to see what elements individual games choose to focus on.
The Fall of Rome scenario was added to Civilization 5 as part of the Gods and Kings expansion pack, the first major pack released for Civilization 5 that changed fundamental aspects of the game. G&K altered aspects of unit combat, implemented a religion/faith mechanic, and added some new civilizations to the game such as Byzantium, Carthage, the Celts, and Ethiopia. The Fall of Rome scenario took advantage of some of these changes by pitting the Roman and Byzantine civilizations (representing the Western and Eastern halves of the late Roman Empire) against 6 enemy civilizations: the Picts, the Vandals, the Franks, the Goths, the Huns, and the Sassanid Persians. The scenario was relatively simple and straightforward: the two Romans civs existed on the same team in charge of a very large number of cities in a massive territory, while their enemies started with small territories, but large and powerful armies. The goal of the scenario was to control the most Imperial Roman cities, thereby earning Victory Points, with the winner being the civilization with the most at the end of 70 game turns. The scenario largely disabled fundamental mechanics like science, religion, and diplomacy, choosing instead of focus on war and combat. Cultural advancement remained, but in a very interesting altered context, that I shall address in more depth shortly. While simple and fun, the scenario’s largest problem for me was the fact that playing as one of the Roman players meant that turns took FOREVER, both for you to play and for the computer to process.
Of the many changes the designers made to the base Civ game to create the scenario, two in particular caught my attention. These two changes were made by the developers to create the unique play experience of the Western Roman Empire. The first change involves the special characteristics assigned to the West Rome faction that give it some strengths that other factions do not have. In Civ 5, all factions have 3 special characteristics: a passive ability, a unique unit, and then either another unique unit or a unique building. Kannada new mp3 songs. In the scenario, the unique units for Western Rome are the same as the normal Roman faction from the base game. This in itself is not massively interesting, though the scenario does put the player in a different situation than a player in the base game. The unique units, the Legion and the Ballista, are very useful in the base game as they are strong units for their time period. The Roman player can use them for some early aggression as they provide a powerful combat advantage. In the scenario, however, the other factions all have equally strong units at the same time, negating any sort of military advantage. Additionally, since the player starts with an empire in place, there is much less room for offensive military actions early in the scenario.
Civ 5 Rome Strategy
What was changed for the Roman faction to make it into the Western Roman Empire, was the faction’s unique ability. The unique ability for the Western Romans is called “Barbarian Enrollment” – in the context of the game, it means that any enemy unit that is eliminated by a Western Roman Legion unit in combat will be essentially resurrected on the spot to fight for the Western Roman player. This is a great ability in game play terms, and a pretty interesting one from a historical perspective. In game play terms, this ability is very strong because the math changes from simply subtracting one enemy unit to subtracting one unit and adding one friendly unit. Sort of a zombie strategy. It’s also quite fun because it allows the Western Roman player to acquire a rather diverse army over time of unique units from the surrounding enemy factions.
Civ 5 Fall Of Rome Scenarios
Next Scenarios Into the Renaissance Prev Scenarios Fall of Rome Attention! This scenario is only available if after clicking on the DLC option in the Menu you have a visible 'Mongolia under Genghis Khan'. You can begin as the ruler of one of the Rome parts - Eastern or Western, as Persians or one of the five Barbarian lords. The game automatically ends after 70 turns - points count, so while playing as Sassanid, Goths, Celts, Huns, Vandals and Franks you need to conquer. On the other side, the Romans must protect themselves from the enemy armies.
In a historical context, the idea of “Barbarian Enrollment” represents the Roman practice of recruiting “barbarian” bands and tribes into the Roman military as foederati – allies of Rome who provided military service to the empire. While Rome had always made use of foreign contingents in her armies, the late Empire saw an increased reliance on armies composed of larger and larger percentages of foreign contingents. Some contingents would be acquired via peaceful negotiation, while others would be coerced from cowed or defeated forces. It should be noted that the coercion of defeated soldiers to serve in one’s army is remarkably common throughout history. The fact that the game designers decided to focus on this aspect of Roman military history is one of the things that I really appreciate about the scenario. It is a great example of a fun game play mechanic that also effectively communicates how diverse Roman armies were during this period of history.
The other major change that caught my attention was the altered Cultural Advancement mechanic. In the base game, culture is a resource that you can accumulate over time and spend on Social Policies. Social Policies are passive boosts to your faction that can help you in a variety of ways based on your play style. Want to focus on the military in your society? Purchase social policies that provide combat bonuses, or speed the production of military units, or give you rewards when you win a battle. Want to focus on Science, Commerce, Diplomacy, or Expansion? Social policies exist for those desires as well. Civ 5 is nicely designed in such a way that each policy evokes a historical/sociological concept. For example, do you develop a Warrior Code, or set up an Oligarchy, or expand Citizenship – all can be chosen, ignored, and implemented at the same time, though there is no removing a policy once it is enacted.
In Fall of Rome, the Cultural Advancement mechanic is heavily changed in purpose, though not in implementation (culture is still a resource you gather and spend). The first part of the change is that the factions are preselected to only have access to certain Social Policies of a completely reworked policy tree. All “barbarian” factions – Goths, Franks, Vandals, etc. – share one set of potential policies, the two Roman Empires share another set, and the Sassanid Persian faction has one set to itself. On the surface, this is a nice way to demonstrate the idea of a shared culture, though the lumping of Goth, Germanic, Hunnic, and Celtic tribes into one grouping is a bit ham-handed to say the least. The real purpose of the culture groups, however, is to essentially establish a narrative. This narrative is simply that during this time period, the Roman Empire was beset by corruption, decadence, and decay, while Persia and the Barbarians were strong and full of vitality. The bonuses the Persians and Barbarians have access to are strong……like really, really strong. Unfairly strong. The Roman policies, on the other hand, are all penalties, something that is VERY new for Civ 5. The Roman factions receive culture passively, and every time they lose a city – an extra punishment so to speak. Every time they acquire X amount of culture, they must pick a policy…….a policy of pure pain for the player. Combat penalties, money penalties, production penalties, etc. Bad, bad stuff. If you don’t have a preset plan for how you will navigate the policies, they alone can do more damage to your empire than the Barbarian hordes.
By themselves, I actually enjoy the Roman Penalty Policies – they’re a new approach and do a good job of communicating the idea that the Roman Empire was suffering from some particular internal problems that exacerbated the threat posed by the Barbarians. My main complaint would be that they over simplify the internal challenges faced by the Roman Empire and hew a bit too closely to the idea that the Roman Empire declined into “an age of darkness and barbarism.” Such an idea is overly romanticized since the reality was that while the Empire itself split up, Roman civilization continued as part of the “barbarian” kingdoms that took its place.
Fall Of Rome Aftermath
All told, the Civ 5 scenario has a lot to recommend it as a starting point for any discussion of the Fall of the Roman Empire.